Also needed to add a call to loop.exit() in FlameInstanceCreationTask so
that it would handle the failure of FileResolvingTask properly
Signed-off-by: Lenny McLennington <lenny@sneed.church>
This prevents custom names from being lost when updating, by only
changing the name if the old instance name constains the old version,
so that we can update it if the user whishes to.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
This makes it harder for problems in the updating process to affect the
current instance. Network issues, for instance, will no longer put the
instance in an invalid state.
Still, a possible improvement to this would be passing that logic to
InstanceStaging instead, to be handled with the instance commiting
directly. However, as it is now, the code would become very spaguetti-y,
and given that the override operation in the commiting could also put
the instance into an invalid state, it seems to me that, in order to
fully error-proof this, we would need to do a copy operation on the
whole instance, in order to modify the copy, and only in the end
override everything an once with a rename. That also has the possibility
of corrupting the instance if done without super care, however, so I
think we may need to instead create an automatic backup system, with an
undo command of sorts, or something like that. This doesn't seem very
trivial though, so it'll probably need to wait until another PR. In the
meantime, the user is advised to always backup their instances before
doing this kind of action, as always.
What a long commit message o.O
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
While working on pack updating, instance naming always gets in the way,
since we need both way of respecting the user's name choice, and a
standarized way of getting the original pack name / version.
This tries to circunvent such problems by abstracting away the naming
schema into it's own struct, holding both the original name / version,
and the user-defined name, so that everyone can be happy and world peace
can be achieved! (at least that's what i'd hope :c).
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
Don't update disabled mods to prevent mod duplication. Also, chop
filename in the metadata with a '.disabled'.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
- Get Project: Already existed but required a specific caller type. This
is more general.
- Get Projects: A single call to multiple of the above
Both providers support these calls.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
This makes the metadata generation code a lot messier and harder to use,
but there's not really much else that can be done about it while
preserving all it's capabilities :(
At least we now have speed
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
This subclasses the Review mods dialog to make a "Update review" one.
Also, all the necessary components built until now are put together in a
coherent unity that checks and generates metadata on-the-fly and checks for
mod updates, while giving and receiving feedback to the user.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
Those tasks take a list of mods and check on the mod providers for
updates. They assume that the mods have metadata already.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
The Modrinth changelog is fairly straight-forward, as it's given to us
directly with the API call we already did. Flame, on the other hand,
requires us to do another call to get the changelog, so it can introduce
quite a heavy performance impact. This way, we make it optional to get
such changelog.
Signed-off-by: flow <flowlnlnln@gmail.com>
* Use the bulk endpoint on mod resolution for faster download
* Search on modrinth for api blocked mods
* Display a dialog for manually downloading blocked mods
